When I was little I always reminded myself
that non-fiction was "not-fake." If a book was made up then it was
fiction a.k.a "fake." I read non-fiction books to be informed about
something. I don't want to read a book about, I don't know, lions and have the
author tell me that they live in Australia. Yes lions might be in zoos in
Australia so it technically isn't "lying" but on the other hand it isn’t
100% accurate. If you produce a memoir that is 95% true then why can't you
make a note at the beginning of the book saying "loosely based on..."
Or maybe even make it a loosely based fiction? Either would work for
me.
"Do you solemnly swear or affirm that
you will tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth..."
This oath that people recite every time they are in court might just
be similar to what happened to Frey when he was on the Oprah
show. These comparisons might be a bit of a stretch, but from the way
Oprah reacted, Frey might as well be a criminal. Frey's story was probably
really good before he came out with the truth. I bet it changed some people
lives when they read it. And I bet he wished he had said that is wasn't
entirely the truth before he published the book. I personally haven’t read the
book, but I know that I would have mixed feelings on whether it would still be
a good book or not. I mean a book is a book. If an author wrote a story about
their life and called fiction then later called it non-fiction I probably
would have a hard time believing what was real and what wasn't. And vise
versa.
No comments:
Post a Comment